To navigate through the Ribbon, use standard browser navigation keys. To skip between groups, use Ctrl+LEFT or Ctrl+RIGHT. To jump to the first Ribbon tab use Ctrl+[. To jump to the last selected command use Ctrl+]. To activate a command, use Enter.
Site Actions
This page location is:
Bedford Regional Water Authority
Customer Service
Engineering Project Feedback
New Item
Browse
Tab 1 of 2.
Edit
Tab 2 of 2.
Sign In
Save
Cancel
Commit
Paste
Cut
Copy
Clipboard
Attach
File
Actions
Employee Login
This List: Engineering Project Feedback
This Site: Customer Service
All Sites
Top Link Bar
Home
About Us
Customer Service
Public Information
Development and Capital Projects
In the News
Contact Us
Customer Service
Quick Launch
Pay Your Bill
Start or Stop Service
Neighborhood Line Extension
Rates & Fees
FAQ
Feedback Forms
How To
Water Conservation
Small Grinder Pumps
Covid-19 News
Bulk Water Fill Stations
All Site Content
Attach File
Project Name
Date
Date Date
Name of Responder
Submitted by
Contractor
Developer
Engineer
Other
Review Phase: Staff was courteous and helpful during project review.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Review Phase: Project review fees were fair and reasonable.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Review Phase: Response time was satisfactory.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Review Phase: Review comments were clear to understand.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Review Phase: Authority processes and standards were clearly conveyed.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Review Phase: Project was carried out consistent with processes and standards provided.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Review Phase: Developer packet provided appropriate amount of information.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Review Phase: Comments or suggestions on the Plan Review?
Construction and Inspection Phase: Inspector was courteous, polite, and professional.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Construction and Inspection Phase - Adequate coordination was maintained during the project.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Construction and Inspection Phase: Comments or suggestions about the Inspection?
Overall Project: Staff was available to answer basic questions.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Overall Project: Closeout procedures were clear and easy to follow.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Overall Project: Authority staff made their best effort to close the project smoothly.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Overall Project: Project was carried out consistently with previous projects.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Overall Project: Comments or suggestions in regards to our operating policies and procedures?
Overall Project: Comments or suggestions on the Overall Project?
Administration: Our rate structure was clear and easy to follow.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Administration: Information was easily located on our website.
Strongly Agree (5)
Agree (4)
No Opinion (3)
Disagree (2)
Strongly Disagree (1)
Administration: Was there any information not currently posted on the Authority's website that would have been helpful to have there?
Attachments
Use this page to add attachments to an item.
Name
Engineering Project Feedback
:
New Item